For decades, researchers have presented different adaptive user interfaces and discussed the pros and cons of adaptation on task performance and satisfaction. Little research, however, has been directed at isolating and understanding those aspects of adaptive interfaces which make some of them successful and others not. We have designed and implemented three adaptive graphical interfaces and evaluated them in two experiments along with a nonadaptive baseline. In this paper we synthesize our results with previous work and discuss how different design choices and interactions affect the success of adaptive graphical user interfaces.
Abstract
For decades, researchers have presented different adaptive user interfaces and discussed the pros and cons of adaptation on task performance and satisfaction. Little research, however, has been directed at isolating and understanding those aspects of adaptive interfaces which make some of them successful and others not. We have designed and implemented three adaptive graphical interfaces and evaluated them in two experiments along with a nonadaptive baseline. In this paper we synthesize our results with previous work and discuss how different design choices and interactions affect the success of adaptive graphical user interfaces.
Available Versions
Slides
Original format:
Other formats (automatically converted, may look different from the original presentation):
Video
{}
Citation Information
Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Mary Czerwinski, Desney S. Tan, and Daniel S. Weld. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In AVI '06: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 201-208, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
BibTeX